The Gurugram hit-and-run case involving biker Shivani Chauhan, known as Sia, and accused driver Kalyan Bainsla has taken another turn after Sia questioned his claim that he was sorry for the crash. Bainsla has admitted that the collision happened but denied intentionally hitting her, saying he lost control near a U-turn and feared being attacked if he stopped. Sia has challenged this explanation and asked why he did not stop to help after the crash. The incident took place on Golf Course Road and was captured in videos that later went viral.Why Did Sia Question Bainsla?Sia has questioned Bainsla’s explanation that the collision was accidental and that he regretted the incident. In a video response, she said the footage showed the car following the bikers before the collision and argued that changing speed does not justify following or confronting another rider. She also focused on what happened immediately after the crash, asking why the driver did not stop if he was concerned about her safety.Bainsla said the collision was not intentional.He claimed he lost control near a U-turn.He said he feared being attacked by the bikers.Sia questioned why he did not stop after the crash.Police are investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident.How The Crash UnfoldedThe incident occurred on September 13 on Gurugram’s Golf Course Road while Sia was riding her Aprilia RS 457 sports bike with other bikers. According to her account, the car followed the group and she alleged that the occupants behaved aggressively before the vehicle struck her motorcycle. Videos circulating online show the motorcycle being hit and Sia falling onto the road.Bainsla has given a different account. He said several bikers repeatedly overtook his vehicle and slowed down in front of it, and claimed Sia suddenly turned while he was making a U-turn. He said he tried to avoid the collision but could not control the car. He also claimed that he left because he feared the group would beat him and his family.Also Read: Gurugram Hit-and-Run Case: Who Is Accused Kalyan Bainsla? Key DetailsLatest Response Intensifies DisputeSia’s latest response has shifted attention from only the collision to what happened afterward. She has rejected the suggestion that the incident should simply be treated as an accident and pointed to the available videos as evidence for her account. She also said the crash could have caused much more serious injuries or even death.The police investigation remains important because the viral footage and statements from both sides present conflicting versions of the incident. Reports said police had identified Bainsla and were searching for him, while an FIR had been registered following the incident.Key HighlightsSia questioned Bainsla’s decision not to stop after the crash.Bainsla admitted the collision but denied deliberately hitting her.He said he feared an attack from the group of bikers.Sia alleged that the car followed her before the collision.Videos of the Aprilia RS 457 crash went viral on social media.Police are examining the competing accounts and available evidence.Investigation Remains OngoingThe Gurugram road rage case has triggered widespread discussion about road safety, accountability and the responsibilities of drivers after a collision. Bainsla has expressed regret over the injury while maintaining that the crash was accidental, whereas Sia has questioned both his explanation and his actions after the impact.The final facts will depend on the police investigation, video evidence and statements collected during the case. At present, the conflicting accounts remain under scrutiny, and allegations from either side should not be treated as proven facts.Disclaimer: This article is published for knowledge and news-information purposes only and reports publicly available developments in the case.
